InsiderScanner identifies unusual insider purchases for research. Ratings, scenarios and historical statistics are model outputs, not investment recommendations.
Sample research case. One case is shown in full so the
format can be judged before signing up. The rest of the open basket
opens as soon as you have an account, at no cost.
1 open case. Ordered as
published by the model, not ranked by expected return.
$NXG
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund
A
HIGH evidence
Swank Jerry V (CFO & Treasurer, See Remarks) reported an open-market purchase of $958,150 on 2026-10-23.
Factors observed 5 of 5
Strong evidence
✓
C-suite executive
Title names CEO, CFO, COO, CTO, President, Chair or Chief
Filing says: CFO & Treasurer, See Remarks
✓
High conviction
Conviction tag equals HIGH
Filing says: HIGH
✓
Oversold setup
14-day RSI at or below 35
Filing says: RSI 22.2
✓
Near 52-week low
Price in the bottom 35% of its 52-week range
Filing says: 7% of 52-week range
✓
Sizeable relative purchase
Purchase worth at least 0.10% of market capitalisation
Filing says: $958,150 · 29.4 bps of market cap
What this is, and is not. Each row is one test with
its exact threshold and the value the filing carried, so the result can be checked rather
than taken on trust. The model publishes a letter tier, not a point total — there is no
score out of anything here because it does not produce one. These are observations about a
filing, not a forecast of what the share price will do.
Context
- Market price at detection
- $44.41
- RSI (14d)
- 22.2
- 52-week range position
- 7%
Independently corroborated
The market-wide Form 4 stream shows 3
insiders buying at $NXG,
1 of them C-suite, totalling
$525,575 — a cluster.
Why it qualified
CFO & Treasurer Jerry Swank put in ~$958K alongside a second insider, a near-brand-new stake (ΔOwn >1000%), real C-suite skin in the game at a deeply washed-out level. Price is just 3.8% off the 52w low, RSI 22 (capitulation), well below MA20/MA50 after an 18% 20-day slide — classic insider-buying-the-bottom setup. Held back from A+ by single-source, no C-suite cluster (only 1 of 2), lagging Financials sector (-5.6% vs SPY) and ~100% return-of-capital distributions that pressure NAV.
What could undermine this
Single source only; sector lagging SPY by 5.6%; distributions estimated ~100% return of capital; recent rights offering (May 2026) created share overhang; CEF NAV erosion risk.
Preview
You are seeing the 5 most recent scored filings.
The rest of the scored ledger, and the research case behind each one — its score,
the factors the model observed, the entry reference and what could undermine it — open
up as soon as you have an account, at no cost. The raw
filings feed, the market insights and every company page are free and stay free.
Evidence, not instructions.
A research case describes reported activity and the factors observed around it. It is not a
recommendation, a prediction, or a position to take. See the
methodology for how each factor is defined.