A published case, in full

This is everything a research case contains.

One real case, dated, exactly as it was published — the reasoning, the numbers behind it, and the risks recorded at the same time. No account, nothing withheld, nothing summarised. It is a past case shown as a worked example, not a current view and not a recommendation.

$GPI
Group 1 Automotive Inc
B Low conviction

Published · scored on the filing date, not the date you are reading this.

InsiderConifer Management, L.L.C. 10%
Reported purchase$23,669,114
Price when scored$278.27
Scenario upper bound$306.1 10.0% above the scored price
Backtest weight15.0% weighting inside the backtest, not advice on position size
Review window30 days

The reasoning, as recorded

Conifer Management dropped a massive $23.7M into GPI on Sep 9, and the setup is clean — 11.5% off the 52w low, 43% below the high, above MA20, RSI 60. The problem: this is a 10% owner with zero C-suite alongside, a modest 6% ΔOwn, which reads more like fund repositioning than internal conviction. Downgraded to B on size/setup alone despite failing the 'C-suite required' spirit; consumer cyclical is lagging SPY by 6% and revenue is down 5.6% YoY.

What was recorded against it

10% owner only, no C-suite buyer (normally a reject trigger); sector lagging SPY by 6.1%; revenue -5.6% YoY; heavy debt load ($5.8B vs $169M cash).

Check it yourself

Every case starts from a filing anyone can read. This one is Conifer Management, L.L.C.'s Form 4 dated 2026-09-09.

Form 4 filings for GPI on SEC EDGAR ↗

That link opens the issuer's full Form 4 list rather than this one filing — the archive behind this page does not carry an accession number for it, so pointing straight at the document would mean guessing the URL. The insider's name and the date above are what you need to find it in the list.

InsiderScanner identifies unusual insider purchases for research. Ratings, scenarios and historical statistics are model outputs, not investment recommendations.